Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Boom Goes Dynamite - Sterk 1090
08-26-2015, 10:47 AM,
Post: #61
RE: Boom Goes Dynamite - Sterk 1090
(08-26-2015, 06:39 AM)hoobs Wrote:
(08-25-2015, 10:22 PM)fowl Wrote: I also prefer we don't partner with MLS - that's another headache with no real benefit. A friend is an owner of a minor league soccer team and looking to get an MLS team. The MLS is VERY particular about stadiums - very. Size, ownership, sharing, revenue rights (signage, food, parking), etc.

I'd frankly be very shocked if SDSU partners with an MLS team knowing what I know.

Yes, the MLS *is* quite particular... but they also make some exceptions (i.e. Seattle) and after things have not gone as planned in Minneapolis and Miami, they might be a bit more open minded about the option to "partner" in some form with SDSU.

Every professional sports league is "quite particular" about their stadium situation, some (NFL) have more clout than others (MLS) to ensure that they get everything that they want out those situations. MLS won't be nearly as bad to partner with as NFL.
Reply
08-26-2015, 10:58 AM,
Post: #62
RE: Boom Goes Dynamite - Sterk 1090
(08-25-2015, 12:18 PM)dirtball Wrote:
(08-25-2015, 10:27 AM)WillyPB Wrote:
(08-25-2015, 09:54 AM)dirtball Wrote:
(08-25-2015, 08:52 AM)SleepingGiantsFan Wrote: Thanks, Steve. I assumed everyone here is college educated and accordingly familiar with the word. Of course, there's a saying about "assume."

This is a dick response.

Even if he thought the word was the epithet, there is no reason to bring up his education or lack there of.

I agree with you dirtball.  This Giant Fan sounds like a first class prick.

He actually isn't, he take criticism really well (better than I).  As shown by his response to my comment.

If any of you guys ever tell that MOW turd about this board, you'll have me to answer to!!! Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
The Aztecs -- now San Diego's premier home town team.
Reply
08-26-2015, 11:20 AM,
Post: #63
RE: Boom Goes Dynamite - Sterk 1090
(08-26-2015, 10:58 AM)aztecfan1 Wrote:
(08-25-2015, 12:18 PM)dirtball Wrote:
(08-25-2015, 10:27 AM)WillyPB Wrote:
(08-25-2015, 09:54 AM)dirtball Wrote:
(08-25-2015, 08:52 AM)SleepingGiantsFan Wrote: Thanks, Steve. I assumed everyone here is college educated and accordingly familiar with the word. Of course, there's a saying about "assume."

This is a dick response.

Even if he thought the word was the epithet, there is no reason to bring up his education or lack there of.

I agree with you dirtball.  This Giant Fan sounds like a first class prick.

He actually isn't, he take criticism really well (better than I).  As shown by his response to my comment.

If any of you guys ever tell that MOW turd about this board, you'll have me to answer to!!! Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Already done Smile
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply
08-26-2015, 11:23 AM,
Post: #64
RE: Boom Goes Dynamite - Sterk 1090
haha, he's won't come here. Besides I am slowly starting to wonder if MOW is APE....
Reply
08-26-2015, 11:49 AM,
Post: #65
RE: Boom Goes Dynamite - Sterk 1090
Just found the "Block" feature on that board. He fit in nicely!
Reply
08-26-2015, 11:54 AM,
Post: #66
RE: Boom Goes Dynamite - Sterk 1090
(08-26-2015, 05:17 AM)k5james Wrote: You can "highly doubt" all you want it doesn't make it any less true...

Doesn't make it any less false.
Reply
08-26-2015, 12:14 PM,
Post: #67
RE: Boom Goes Dynamite - Sterk 1090
(08-26-2015, 11:54 AM)USDfan Wrote:
(08-26-2015, 05:17 AM)k5james Wrote: You can "highly doubt" all you want it doesn't make it any less true...

Doesn't make it any less false.

Except...you know...its is...
Reply
08-26-2015, 12:17 PM,
Post: #68
RE: Boom Goes Dynamite - Sterk 1090
(08-26-2015, 11:54 AM)USDfan Wrote:
(08-26-2015, 05:17 AM)k5james Wrote: You can "highly doubt" all you want it doesn't make it any less true...

Doesn't make it any less false.
There was no negotiation back on 04', when the Padres left, from what I can tell. Operational control seems to have been simply handed to the Chargers to the detriment of a one of the programs you claim to care about. 


[fon‌t=Georgia, serif]"The problem is that the Aztecs don’t really “share” Qualcomm Stadium with the Chargers. SDSU has played 61 home games at the Q before more than 1 million people since 2004, and it got no revenue from parking, concessions or in-stadium advertising from all that exposure. The Chargers have controlled exclusive signage and advertising rights since the Padres left in 2004, along with access to most of the luxury suites."[/font]

[fon‌t=Georgia, serif]http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/2015/may/20/sdsu-football-stadium-CSAG-Chargers-rent/[/font]
Reply
08-26-2015, 12:25 PM,
Post: #69
RE: Boom Goes Dynamite - Sterk 1090
(08-26-2015, 12:17 PM)AztecSU Wrote:
(08-26-2015, 11:54 AM)USDfan Wrote:
(08-26-2015, 05:17 AM)k5james Wrote: You can "highly doubt" all you want it doesn't make it any less true...

Doesn't make it any less false.
There was no negotiation back on 04', when the Padres left, from what I can tell. Operational control seems to have been simply handed to the Chargers to the detriment of a one of the programs you claim to care about. 


[fon‌t=Georgia, serif]"The problem is that the Aztecs don’t really “share” Qualcomm Stadium with the Chargers. SDSU has played 61 home games at the Q before more than 1 million people since 2004, and it got no revenue from parking, concessions or in-stadium advertising from all that exposure. The Chargers have controlled exclusive signage and advertising rights since the Padres left in 2004, along with access to most of the luxury suites."[/font]

[fon‌t=Georgia, serif]http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/2015/may/20/sdsu-football-stadium-CSAG-Chargers-rent/[/font]

And "one of the programs I claim to care about" let it happen. So you should be directing your anger at them.
Reply
08-26-2015, 12:33 PM,
Post: #70
RE: Boom Goes Dynamite - Sterk 1090
(08-26-2015, 12:25 PM)USDfan Wrote:
(08-26-2015, 12:17 PM)AztecSU Wrote:
(08-26-2015, 11:54 AM)USDfan Wrote:
(08-26-2015, 05:17 AM)k5james Wrote: You can "highly doubt" all you want it doesn't make it any less true...

Doesn't make it any less false.
There was no negotiation back on 04', when the Padres left, from what I can tell. Operational control seems to have been simply handed to the Chargers to the detriment of a one of the programs you claim to care about. 


[fon‌t=Georgia, serif]"The problem is that the Aztecs don’t really “share” Qualcomm Stadium with the Chargers. SDSU has played 61 home games at the Q before more than 1 million people since 2004, and it got no revenue from parking, concessions or in-stadium advertising from all that exposure. The Chargers have controlled exclusive signage and advertising rights since the Padres left in 2004, along with access to most of the luxury suites."[/font]

[fon‌t=Georgia, serif]http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/2015/may/20/sdsu-football-stadium-CSAG-Chargers-rent/[/font]

And "one of the programs I claim to care about" let it happen. So you should be directing your anger at them.

Anger? Where are you getting anger? Please don't project onto me man. 

Please explain how the transfer of control of the Q is the fault of people who had NO say in the matter. You're coming off as a contrarian who simply wants to strike a dissonant chord without addressing the reasoning behind your commentary.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)